Reid to Obama: 'Back off' on earmarks' - common sense, NOT

Mr Obama, in his state of the union speech said:  “Because the American people deserve to know that special interests aren't larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in Congress should know this: If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it.”

Harry Reid, Senate majority Leader, said: “This is an applause line,” the Nevada Democrat told NBC News Wednesday regarding Obama’s pledge not to sign a bill with earmark spending in it. “It’s an effort by the White House to get more power. They have enough power as it is.” He went on to remark: “The money is going to be spent anyway,” said Reid. “The difference is the White House is going to be directed where its spent, not us. That’s our obligation. This does not save any money.”

Lets try some common sense.  There are three branches of government, judiciary, legislative, and executive.  The executive is responsible for executing the laws passed by the legislative branch.  Mr Reid wants to argue that this is a power grab by the executive, when in fact it's an inherent responsibility of the executive branch. Mr Reid wants Congress to direct spending.  Common Sense thinks that rimes with using money to buy influence, pay back contributors, and insure reelection!  Common Sense thinks it's time for Congress to focus on their job, passing laws that set policy and address the needs US citizens.